4.4 Article

SWAP-70 regulates erythropoiesis by controlling α4 integrin

期刊

HAEMATOLOGICA-THE HEMATOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 96, 期 12, 页码 1743-1752

出版社

FERRATA STORTI FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2011.050468

关键词

erythropoiesis; alpha 4 integrin; SWAP-70; adhesion; anemia

资金

  1. DFG [SFB655, B4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The regulation of normal and stress-induced erythropoiesis is incompletely understood. Integrin-dependent adhesion plays important roles in erythropoiesis, but how integrins are regulated during erythropoiesis remains largely unknown. Design and Methods To obtain novel insights into the regulation of erythropoiesis, we used cellular and molecular approaches to analyze the role of SWAP-70 and the control of integrins through SWAP-70. In addition, mice deficient for this protein were investigated under normal and erythropoietic stress conditions. Results We show that SWAP-70, a protein involved in cytoskeletal F-actin rearrangements and integrin regulation in mast cells, is expressed in hematopoietic stem cells and myeloid-erythroid precursors. Although Swap-70(-/-) mice are not anemic, erythroblastic differentiation is perturbed, and SWAP-70 is required for an efficient erythropoietic stress response to acute anemia and for erythropoietic recovery after bone marrow transplantation in irradiated mice. SWAP-70 deficiency impairs colony-forming unit erythroid development, while burst-forming unit erythroid development is normal, and significantly affects development of late erythroblasts in the spleen and bone marrow. The alpha 4 integrin is constitutively hyper-activated in Swap-70(-/-) colony-forming unit erythroid cells, which hyper-adhere to fibronectin. Blocking alpha 4 and beta 1 integrin chains in vivo restored erythroblastic differentiation and the erythropoietic stress response in Swap-70(-/-) mice. Conclusions Our study reveals that SWAP-70 is a novel regulator of integrin-mediated red blood cell development and stress-induced erythropoiesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据