4.6 Article

Impact of robotics on the outcome of elderly patients with endometrial cancer

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 133, 期 3, 页码 556-562

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.03.572

关键词

Elderly; Endometrial cancer; Robotic surgery; Open surgery; Morbidity; Survival

资金

  1. Israel Cancer Research Foundation
  2. Week-end to End Women Cancers
  3. Levy Family Fund
  4. Gloria's Girls
  5. INSERM (Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To evaluate the impact of introducing a robotics program on clinical outcome of elderly patients with endometrial cancer. Methods. Evaluation and comparison of pen-operative morbidity and disease-free interval in 163 consecutive elderly patients (>= 70 years) with endometrial cancer undergoing staging procedure with traditional open surgery compared to robotic surgery. Results. All consecutive patients >= 70 years of age with endometrial cancer who underwent robotic surgery (n = 113) were compared with all consecutive patients >= 70 years of age (n = 50) before the introduction of a robotic program in December 2007. Baseline patient characteristics were similar in both eras. Patients undergoing robotic surgery had longer mean operating times (244 compared with 217 minutes, p = 0.009) but fewer minor adverse events (17% compared with 60%, p < 0.001). The robotics cohort had less estimated mean blood loss (75 vs 334 ml, p < 0.0001) and shorter mean hospital stay (3 vs 6 days, p < 0.0001). There was no difference in disease-free survival (p = 0.61) during the mean follow-up time of 2 years. Conclusion. Transitioning from open surgery to a robotics program for the treatment of endometrial cancer in the elderly has significant benefits, including lower minor complication rate, less operative blood loss and shorter hospitalization without compromising 2-year disease-free survival. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据