4.5 Article

Changes in coronal alignment of the ankle joint after high tibial osteotomy

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3890-3

关键词

High tibial osteotomy; Alignment; Knee; Ankle

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in coronal alignment of the ankle joint after HTO. Our hypothesis was that ankle joint orientation may become more parallel or less parallel to the ground after HTO, and this change may affect ankle symptoms. Eighty-six knees were retrospectively analysed after HTO for varus osteoarthritis. Preoperative and follow-up whole-leg radiographs were taken. The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured to evaluate coronal alignment of the knee. Tibial plafond inclination (TPI), talar inclination (TI), talar tilt (TT), and lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) were measured to evaluate coronal alignment of the ankle. Patients were divided into two groups: those who exhibited a decrease in the absolute value of TPI and TI after HTO (group A) and those who exhibited an increase in the absolute value of TPI or TI after HTO (group B). Clinical outcomes of the knee and ankle were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Mean TPI and TI changed from 6.9A degrees A +/- 3.6A degrees and 8.0A degrees A +/- 3.8A degrees to 2.8A degrees A +/- 3.1A degrees and 3.9A degrees A +/- 3.0A degrees in group A (P < 0.001 for both) and from -1.3A degrees A +/- 3.7A degrees and 0.6A degrees A +/- 4.5A degrees to -6.0A degrees A +/- 4.2A degrees and -4.6A degrees A +/- 5.9A degrees in group B (P = 0.018 for both). VAS for ankle pain did not change significantly after HTO (n.s.) in group A, whereas those of group B increased significantly after HTO (P = 0.014). Ankle joint orientation becomes more parallel or less parallel to the ground after HTO. Smaller preoperative HKA and LDTA result in a more valgus ankle joint orientation after HTO. Ankle symptoms were affected by coronal alignment changes of the ankle after HTO. III.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据