4.6 Article

Accuracy of colposcopy management to detect CIN3 and invasive cancer in women with abnormal screening tests: Results from a primary HPV screening project from 2006 to 2011 in Wolfsburg, Germany

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 128, 期 2, 页码 282-287

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.10.017

关键词

HPV screening; Colposcopy management; Failure tate; Quality assessment

资金

  1. Deutsche BKK in Wolfsburg, Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Combining HPV and Pap screening achieves very good risk stratification and sensitive detection of CIN3 and cancer (CIN3 +), but poorer specificity, and may result in an increased risk of glandular and new lesions during follow-up. We examined if this phenomenon may compromise the accuracy of colposcopy. Methods. As part of a primary HPV screening pilot project comprising 19,624 participants aged over 30 years, the failure rate to detect CIN3 at first visit was measured over a five-year period to assess the quality of colposcopy as an overall management concept. Management relied on excisional biopsies in all HSIL cytology or major findings on colposcopy, endocervical assessment in type 3 transformation zones (TZ) and guided biopsies in type 1 or 2 TZ. Results. Of 667 women referred for colposcopy because of atypical Pap smears and/or HPV persistency, 171 were diagnosed with CIN3 +. All 18 cancers and 140/153 CIN3 cases were diagnosed at the first visit. Of 13 CIN3 observed during follow-up, five were classified as new cases, five as definite and three as probably colposcopy failures, giving a failure rate of 4.7% (8/171). Only three failures were related to false-negative punch biopsies while five occurred because of false-negative endocervical assessment in type 3 TZ. Conclusions. Colposcopy management following defined pathways was safe in this HPV screening program with an acceptable failure rate. Further improvements may depend on developing better methods for endocervical assessment rather than for ectocervical biopsies. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据