4.6 Article

Tumor volume successively reflects the state of disease progression in endometrial cancer

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 129, 期 3, 页码 472-477

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.02.034

关键词

Endometrial cancer; Tumor-volume; Spectrum theory; Lymph node metastasis; Prognosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. This study aimed to clarify the clinical significance of tumor volume in endometrial cancer. Methods. A total of 667 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent preoperative MRI and surgical treatment including lymphadenectomy were enrolled. As the surrogate marker of actual tumor volume, the volume index was defined as the product of the maximum longitudinal diameter along the uterine axis, the maximum intersecting anteroposterior diameter of the sagittal section image, and the maximum horizontal diameter of the horizontal section image from the MRI data. The volume index was divided into five categories: Group 1 (<8), Group 2 (8 to <27), Group 3 (27 to <64), Group 4 (64 to <125), and Group 5 (125 or more). The relationships between various clinicopathologic factors and volume index were investigated, and Cox regression analysis was conducted to assess the significance of volume index with respect to prognosis. Results. High-risk clinicopathologic findings increased with tumor volume. The lymph node metastasis rate was 3% in Group 1,9% in Group 2, 17% in Group 3,25% in Group 4, and 53% in Group 5. Cox regression analysis showed that the volume index (>= 36) was a prognostic factor (hazard ratio: 2.0, 95% confidence interval: 13-3.1) independent of older age (>= 58 years), high-risk histological grade/subtype, deep myoinvasion, lymph node metastasis, and type of surgery. Conclusion. Tumor volume successively reflects the state of disease progression in endometrial cancer. The volume index can give information on both the staged prognosis and surgical management. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据