4.6 Article

Eeyarestatin causes cervical cancer cell sensitization to bortezomib treatment by augmenting ER stress and CHOP expression

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 128, 期 2, 页码 383-390

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.10.021

关键词

Eeyarestatin; Bortezomib; Cervical cancer; Endoplasmic reticulum stress; Heat shock protein

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib is currently being tested in clinical trials against refractory cervical cancer. However, high doses of bortezomib are associated with adverse effects, which may lead to treatment abrogation or to the use of lower, ineffective doses. We investigated combination drug treatments that could enhance the efficacy of low bortezomib concentrations on cervical cancer cells. Methods. The cervical cancer cell lines CaSki, HeLa and SW756 were treated with various combinations of bortezomib and eeyarestatin. Treated cells were analyzed for cell viability by clonal assays and the MIT assay, and for expression of pro-apoptotic proteins and cell stress markers by immunofluorescence, immunoblots and RT-PCR analysis. Results. Cotreatment of bortezomib with eeyarestatin markedly enhanced cell death in cervical cancer cells, allowing reduction of the bortezomib concentration necessary for efficient cell death to as low as 5 ng/ml. Combination of bortezomib with eeyarestatin resulted in a massive induction of the endoplasmic reticulum stress reaction, small and large heat shock protein activation, autophagy, and upregulation of pro-apoptotic CHOP. Conclusion. Eeyarestatin is a small molecule recently shown to cause endoplasmic reticulum stress by inhibiting the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation pathway, which directs misfolded cytotoxic proteins to proteasomal degradation. Concomitant inhibition of both pathways markedly enhances the efficacy of bortezomib against cervical cancer cells and thus may be applied to reduce the bortezomib dosage required for efficient cervical cancer treatment. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据