4.6 Article

Phase II trial of erlotinib in women with squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 127, 期 1, 页码 141-146

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.06.028

关键词

Vulvar carcinoma; Chemotherapy; Erlotinib

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of erlotinib in the management of sguamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the vulva. Methods. Patients with vulvar lesions amenable to surgery or chemoradiation (cohort 1) or those with metastatic measurable disease (cohort 2) received erlotinib 150 mg daily. Patients were monitored for toxicity. Responses were determined by digital photography or RECIST 1.1. Cohort 1 underwent pre and post treatment biopsies. EGFR immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), and mutational analysis were performed. Results. 41 patients were enrolled: 17 in cohort 1 and 24 in cohort 2. Notable grade 3 or 4 toxicities included allergic reaction (1), diarrhea/electrolyte abnormalities (3), ischemic colitis (1), and renal failure (3) and electrolyte abnormalities (n = 2). Mean number of cycles for cohort 2 was 3.3. Overall clinical benefit rate was 67.5% with 11 (27.5%) partial responses (PR), 16 (40.0%) stable disease (SD), and 7 (17.5%) progressive disease. Responses were of short duration. All pre and post treatment biopsies exhibited 2-3 + EGFR staining. 5 of 14 patients (35%) were found to have EGFR amplification (n = 3) or high polysomy/trisomy (n = 2). These five patients had either a PR (n = 3) or SD (n = 2). Gain of function mutations were not been identified. Conclusions. This is the first reported controlled trial evaluating erlotinib for the management of vulvar carcinoma. Toxicities were acceptable given the lack of treatment options for these patients. Given the observed clinical benefits erlotinib may represent one of the most active agents available to treat vulvar SCC. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据