4.6 Article

Age-specific trends in black-white disparities in cervical cancer incidence in the United States: 1975-2009

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 127, 期 3, 页码 611-615

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.08.021

关键词

Cervical cancer; Disparity; Human papillomavirus (HPV); Incidence; Race

资金

  1. American Cancer Society

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Although overall cervical cancer incidence rates have decreased in both black and white women in the U.S. since the mid 1950s due to widespread screening, rates continue to be higher among blacks than among whites. However, whether this pattern differs by age is unknown. Methods. Cervical cancer cases (1975-2009, N=36,503) were obtained from nine Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program registries. Age-standardized incidence rates for white and black women were calculated from 1975-1979 through 2005-2009 by age group (<50, 50-64, and >= 65 years). Rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (Os) evaluated differences in rates for blacks vs. whites by age group and stage at diagnosis during 1975-1979 and 2005-2009. Results. Among women aged <50 years, the black-to-white disparity RR decreased from nearly two-fold (RR, 1.9; 95% CI. 1.7-2.1) during 1975-1979 to unity during 2005-2009 (RR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8-1.0). In contrast, rates remained significantly elevated for blacks vs. whites aged 50-64 years (RR, 2.4; 95% CI, 2.1-2.7 and 1.7; 95% CI, 1.5-2.0), and for those aged 65 years (RR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.9-3.8 and 2.2; 95% CI, 1.9-2.7) during both time periods, although the disparities decreased over time. Similar disparities persisted for older black women with cervical cancer of all stages. Conclusion. Disparities in cervical cancer incidence rates were eliminated for younger blacks vs. whites but persisted for blacks aged 50 years and older. Additional strategies are needed to increase follow-up and treatment of precancerous lesions among middle-aged and older black women. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据