4.6 Article

High Beclin 1 expression defines a poor prognosis in endometrial adenocarcinomas

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 123, 期 1, 页码 147-151

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.06.023

关键词

Autophagy; Beclin 1; HIF1 alpha; Prognosis; Endometrial adenocarcinoma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To investigate the prognostic role of Beclin 1 in endometrial adenocarcinomas of the endometrioid cell type. Beclin 1 is a known tumor suppressor gene, but its function may be altered under conditions of an accelerated autophagic activity, which provides additional energy to proliferating cells by recycling defective organelles and long-lived cytoplasmic proteins. Materials and methods. One hundred and fifty-five endometrioid adenocarcinomas were investigated for their autophagic activity using the monoclonal antibody Beclin 1 and an automated immunohistochemical technique. The extent of Beclin 1 expression was evaluated on a three-tier scale as follows: low (<10% positive tumor cells), intermediate (between 10% and 50% positive tumor cells), and high (>50% positive tumor cells). The results were correlated with the degree of tumor differentiation, the depth of myometrial invasion and the overall 5-year survival. In addition, the endometrial tumors were immunostained with the hypoxia inducible factor 1 alpha (HIF1 alpha) and their expression was related to Beclin 1. Results. A high Beclin 1 reactivity occurred in 18.1% of endometrial adenocarcinomas studied and was associated with high tumor grade, high myometrial invasion and a poor 5-year survival. It was also correlated positively with HIF1 alpha. Of the remaining adenocarcinomas 29.7% were of intermediate Beclin 1 reactivity and 52.2% of low, but correlations with prognostic factors were insignificant. Conclusion. An increased Beclin 1 expression is connected with the most aggressive endometrioid adenocarcinomas, probably as a result of its strong association with tumor hypoxia. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据