4.6 Article

Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy in stage I endometrial cancer

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 122, 期 1, 页码 79-82

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.03.017

关键词

DNA ploidy; Aneuploidy; Stage I endometrial cancer; Flow cytometry

资金

  1. Ministry for Health & Welfare Affairs, Republic of Korea [A092255]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To improve the outcome for patients with endometrial cancer, a more accurate prognostic assessment is needed. The current study was undertaken to determine the role of flow cytometric DNA ploidy as an independent prognostic factor in patients with stage I endometrial cancer and to verify if ploidy is able to identify high-risk cases among the apparent 'low-risk patients, defined as stage (IA), grade (1 or 2), and histologic type (endometrioid). Methods. This was a retrospective study. DNA ploidy was evaluated from tumor samples in 217 patients with stage I endometrial cancer who underwent definitive surgery as the first treatment between 2003 and 2009. Ploidy and other classic parameters were analyzed in relation to the length of recurrence-free survival. Results. Among the 217 evaluated patients, 184 (84.8%) had diploid tumors and 33 (15.2%) had aneuploid tumors. There were 12 recurrences during the median follow-up intervals of 42.7 months. Stage, grade, histologic type, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and ploidy were significantly correlated with recurrence-free interval by univariate Cox analysis. Based on multivariate Cox analysis, ploidy was an independent prognostic factor, with a hazard ratio of 4.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-15.3; P = 0.017) adjusted for stage, grade, histologic type, and LVSI. In low-risk patients (n = 156), the recurrence rate was 2.1% for diploid tumors and 12.5% for aneuploid tumors (P = 0.038). Conclusions. DNA aneuploidy is an independent prognostic factor in patients with endometrial cancer and can identify high-risk patients among those considered 'low-risk' with stage I endometrial cancer. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据