4.6 Article

Feasibility of less radical surgery for superficially invasive carcinoma of the cervix

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 119, 期 2, 页码 187-191

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.06.027

关键词

Cervical cancer; Parametrial involvement; Depth of invasion; Less radical surgery

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2009-0093820, R31-2008-000-10056-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To determine the incidence of parametrial involvement in patients with superficially invasive cervical cancer and to assess the feasibility of less radical surgery in this subset of patients. Patients and methods. A retrospective analysis was performed in 375 patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer who underwent radical surgery at Seoul National University Hospital from 2000 to 2008. Parametrial involvement in patients with invasion <= 5 mm was the primary outcome of this study. In addition, the differences in pathologic variables according to the depth of invasion (<= 5 vs. >5 mm) were evaluated using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Survivals were also estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results. During the study period, 140 cases with invasion <= 5 mm were identified. Mean depth of invasion was 3.30 +/- 1.36 mm, and mean diameter of width was 16.6 +/- 7.5 mm (range, 2-36 mm). None of these patients had parametrial involvement. However, lymph node metastasis was present in 5 patients (3.6%). In contrast, among patients with invasion >5 mm, parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis were present in 36 (15.3%) and 54 patients (23.0%), respectively. 5-year disease-free survival in patients with invasion <= 5 mm was 97.5%, which was significantly better than 87.3% in patients with invasion >5 mm (P=0.002). Conclusion. We have demonstrated that stage IB1 patients with depth of invasion <= 5 mm are at very low risk for parametrial involvement. These low-risk patients could be candidates for prospective clinical trials on less radical surgery omitting parametrectomy. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据