4.6 Article

Concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel and intravaginal radiation in surgical stage I-II serous endometrial cancer

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 112, 期 1, 页码 142-145

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.006

关键词

Serous endometrial cancer; Intravaginal RT; Carboplatin paclitaxel

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R25 CA020449, T32 CA009207-35, T32 CA009207] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To report a single institution experience in surgical stage I-II serous endometrial cancer using combined carboplatin/paclitaxel and intravaginal radiation (IVRT). Methods. Between 10/00 and 12/06, 25 stage I-II patients with serous endometrial cancer were treated at our institution with surgery, postoperative IVRT, and concurrent chemotherapy (CT). Results. The mean age was 67 years old (range, 53-80 years). Surgery consisted of hysterectomy (TAH/BSO, 64%. LAVH/BSO, 36%), peritoneal washing, omental biopsy, and pelvic lymph-node dissection (median 14 nodes). Para-aortic node sampling was done in 88% (median, 6). IVRT median dose was 21 Gy (range, 18-21 Gy, in 3 fractions) and concurrent CT consisted of carboplatin to AUC = 5 and taxol to 175 mg/m(2) given every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. CT was well tolerated with 22/25 (88%) receiving 6 cycles. Three patients received <= 5 cycles; 2 owing to physician preference (3 and 4 cycles) and 1 owing to toxicity (5 cycles). Only 1 patient (4%) had grade 3 toxicity (abscess). Grade 2 neurotoxicity was seen in 5 patients (20%), All patients finished their IVRT as scheduled, and there was no grade 3 toxicity. With a median follow-up of 30 months, the 5-year progression-free and overall survival rate was 88%. None of the patients developed vaginal recurrence. Conclusions. Based on this study, surgical staging followed by IVRT and carboplatin/paclitaxel is well tolerated and effective in stage I-II serous endometrial cancer. Confirmation of these results on a larger number of patients with longer follow-up is still needed. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据