4.6 Article

Topotecan weekly bolus chemotherapy for relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian and peritoneal cancers

期刊

GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY
卷 109, 期 3, 页码 346-352

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.02.028

关键词

chemotherapy; platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer; relapsed ovarian cancer; topotecan; weekly topotecan

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA-22453, P30 CA022453] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. Topotecan at a dose of 1.5mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5 of a 21-day cycle is an approved therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer. However, heavily pretreated patients may be predisposed to hematologic adverse events. This prospective study, therefore, investigates the safety and efficacy of an alternate weekly schedule of topotecan in patients with recurrent ovarian or peritoneal cancer. Methods. Patients with potentially platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian or peritoneal cancer were treated with 4.0 mg/m(2) weekly topotecan as tolerated until disease progression. Antitumor response and safety were assessed. Dose reductions, delays, or omissions were implemented for grades 3-4 adverse events. Results. Of the 41 enrolled patients (median age, 62 years; range, 42 to 82 years), 39 patients had ovarian cancer, and 2 patients had peritoneal cancer. The median platinum-free interval was 11.7 months. A median of 9 topotecan cycles (range, I to 45 doses) was administered. Weekly topotecan was well tolerated: 7 (17%) patients had grades 3-4 neutropenia, and 9 (22%) had grades 3-4 fatigue. No grade 4 thrombocytopenia or anemia was reported. Of 38 response-evaluable patients, 1 (3%) had a complete response, 8 (21 %) had a partial response, 16 (42%) had stable disease, and 13 (34%) had progressive disease. Conclusions. Weekly topotecan was well tolerated in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian or peritoneal cancer at first relapse, with a hematologic profile that compared favorably with that of the 5-day topotecan regimen. Moreover, antitumor activity was similar to that reported for the 5-day regimen. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据