4.3 Article

Cyclooxygenase 2 in Gastric Carcinoma Is Expressed in Doublecortin- and CaM Kinase-Like-1-Positive Tuft Cells

期刊

GUT AND LIVER
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 508-518

出版社

EDITORIAL OFFICE GUT & LIVER
DOI: 10.5009/gnl13237

关键词

Sox9; Cdx2-transgenic mice; Stem cell marker

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [22114002]
  2. KEIRIN RACE
  3. [21590793]
  4. [21590794]
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22114002, 23590926] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background/Aims: Doublecortin and CaM kinase-like-1 (DCAMKL1) is a marker of stem cells expressed predominantly in the crypt base in the intestine. However, DCAMKL1-positive cells have been shown to be differentiated tuft cells rather than quiescent progenitors. Tuft cells are the only epithelial cells that express cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) in the normal intestinal epithelium. We previously generated Cdx2-transgenic mice as model mice for intestinal metaplasia and gastric carcinoma. In the current study, we investigated the association between COX-2 and DCAMKL1 in gastric carcinoma. Methods: We examined the association between COX-2 and DCAMKL1 expression in gastric carcinomas in clinical samples (early gastric well-differentiated adenocarcinoma) and Cdx2-transgenic mice; and the DCAMKL1-transgenic mouse stomach using immunohistochemistry and quantitative real-time polimerase chain reaction. Results: The COX-2-expressing cells were scattered, not diffusely expressed, in gastric carcinomas from humans and Cdx2-transgenic mice. DCAMKL1-positive cells were also scattered in the gastric carcinomas, indicating that tuft cells could still be present in gastric carcinoma. COX-2 was expressed in DCAMKL1-positive tuft cells in Cdx2- and DCAMKL1-transgenic mouse stomachs, whereas the Sox9 transcription factor was ubiquitously expressed in gastric carcinomas, including COX-2-positive cells. Conclusions: COX-2 is expressed in DCAMKL1-expressing quiescent tuft cells in gastric carcinoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据