4.8 Article

β7 integrins are required to give rise to intestinal mononuclear phagocytes with tolerogenic potential

期刊

GUT
卷 63, 期 9, 页码 1431-1440

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305386

关键词

-

资金

  1. Crohn's & Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA)
  2. CCFA
  3. NIH [DP2 2009A054301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and objective While pro-inflammatory monocyte trafficking to the intestine has been partially characterised, the molecules required for migration of tolerogenic mononuclear phagocytes (dendritic cells (DC) and macrophages) are unknown. We hypothesised that the gut-homing receptor integrin alpha 4 beta 7 is required for this process. Methods We used a T cell-mediated colitis model to study the role of alpha 4 beta 7 in the innate immune compartment. We then performed competitive bone marrow (BM) reconstitution experiments to assess the requirement of alpha 4 beta 7 in the generation of intestinal retinoic acid (RA)-producing CD11c(hi) DC (ALDE(+)DC) and CD64 macrophages. Using mixed BM chimeras we also asked whether alpha 4 beta 7 is required to give rise to tolerogenic mononuclear phagocytes. Results Lack of beta 7 integrins in the innate immune compartment (beta 7(-/-)RAG2(-/-) mice) markedly accelerated T cell-mediated colitis, which was correlated with lower numbers and frequencies of ALDE(+)DC in mesenteric lymph nodes. Consistent with a role of alpha 4 beta 7 in the generation of intestinal mononuclear phagocytes, BM cells from beta 7(-/-) mice poorly reconstituted small intestine ALDE(+)DC and M. when compared to their wild type counterparts. In addition, mice lacking beta 7 integrins in the CD11c(hi) compartment showed decreased ability to induce Foxp3(+) T-REG and IL-10-producing T cells. Conclusions Mice lacking beta 7 integrins in the innate immune compartment are more susceptible to intestinal inflammation, which is correlated with a requirement of beta 7 integrins to reconstitute gut mononuclear phagocytes with tolerogenic potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据