4.8 Article

Activation of brain macrophages/microglia cells in hepatitis C infection

期刊

GUT
卷 59, 期 10, 页码 1394-1400

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2009.199356

关键词

-

资金

  1. National NeuroAIDS Tissue Consortium [N01MH32002]
  2. Alzheimer's Disease Research Center [5P50AG005142]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is commonly associated with cognitive dysfunction. Viral sequences and proteins were previously found in brain macrophage/microglia cells. The aim of the current study was to determine whether HCV infection affects the expression of key cytokines and chemokines in these cells. Methods Autopsy brain tissue from 15 patients was studied; 7 patients were HCV positive and 8 were HCV negative. Cryostat sections of frontal cortex and subcortical white matter were stained with monoclonal antibodies specific for microglia/macrophages (anti-CD68) and separated by laser capture microscopy. Transcripts representing 25 various cytokines and chemokines were measured by real-time quantitative PCR. Results Compared with HCV-negative controls, HCV-positive patients demonstrated significantly higher levels of proinflammatory cytokines interleukin 1 alpha (IL-1 alpha), IL-1 beta, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha), IL-12 and IL-18. HCV infection was also associated with increased transcription of chemokines IL-8, IL-16 and interferon-inducible protein 10 (IP-10). Type 1 interferon (IFN) activation was suggested by increased concentrations of IFN beta and myxovirus resistance protein A (MxA) transcripts. Similar results were obtained when CD68-positive/ HCV-positive cells were compared with CD68-positive/ HCV-negative cells in each of the 7 HCV-infected patients. Conclusion Evidence was found for activation of brain macrophages/ microglia cells in autopsy brain tissue from HCV-positive patients. These findings could relate to the common presence of neurocognitive dysfunction among patients with chronic hepatitis C.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据