4.8 Article

Differential regulation of interleukin 17 and interferon γ production in inflammatory bowel disease

期刊

GUT
卷 58, 期 12, 页码 1629-1636

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2009.182170

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aims: Interleukin 17 (IL17) is now known to be involved in a number of chronic inflammatory disorders. However, the mechanisms regulating its production in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are still unclear. Methods: Endoscopic biopsies or surgical specimens were taken from inflamed and uninflamed colonic mucosa of 72 patients with IBD (38 with Crohn's disease and 34 with ulcerative colitis), and normal colon of 38 control subjects. IL17 and interferon gamma (IFN gamma) were detected by ELISA in the supernatants of biopsies cultured ex vivo, and anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated lamina propria mononuclear cells (LPMCs) incubated with IL12, IL23, IL1b plus IL6, transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF beta 1), or anti-IL21 neutralising antibody. Intracellular flow cytometry was performed to analyse mucosal Th17 and Th1/Th17 cells. Results: IL17 production by organ culture biopsies was higher in IBD inflamed mucosa than IBD uninflamed mucosa and controls, and was equivalent in amount to IFN gamma. Anti-CD3/CD28-stimulated IBD LPMCs produced higher IL17 amounts compared to controls. The percentages of Th17 and Th1/Th17 cells were increased in patients with IBD. IL23 and IL1 beta plus IL6 had no effect on IBD LPMC production of IL17; however, IL12 markedly increased IFN gamma production and decreased IL17 production. TGF beta 1 dose-dependently decreased IFN gamma, but had no significant inhibitory effect on IL17 production. Blocking IL21 significantly downregulated IL17 production. Conclusions: Our findings support a role for IL12, TGF beta and IL21 in modulating IL17/IFN gamma production in IBD. The abundant IL17 in inflamed IBD mucosa may help explain the relative lack of efficacy of anti-IFN gamma antibodies in clinical trials of Crohn's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据