4.8 Article

Relationship between symptoms and ingestion of a meal in functional dyspepsia

期刊

GUT
卷 57, 期 11, 页码 1495-1503

出版社

B M J PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2007.137125

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Backgound and aims: A subset of functional dyspepsia ( FD) patients report meal-related symptoms, possibly representing a pathophysiologically homogeneous subgroup. The aim of the present study was to establish the time-course of symptoms in relation to meal ingestion, and to assess the relationship between self-reported meal-related symptoms and pathophysiological mechanisms in FD. Methods: 218 FD patients ( 149 women, mean ( SEM) age 39 ( 1) years) filled out a symptom questionnaire, including meal-induced aggravation. All patients underwent a gastric emptying breath test with severity ( 0-4) scoring of six symptoms ( pain, fullness, bloating, nausea, burning and belching) at each sampling ( 15 min interval for 4 h). In 129 patients, gastric sensitivity and accommodation were assessed by barostat. Results: The intensity of each FD symptom was significantly increased 15 min after the meal, compared with the premeal score, and remained elevated until the end of the measurement period ( all p<0.05). The time-course of individual symptoms varied, with early peaks for fullness and bloating, intermediate peaks for nausea and belching, and late peaks for pain and burning. Meal-induced aggravation was reported by 79% of patients, and in these patients postprandial fullness, which peaked early, was the most intense symptom. In patients without self-reported meal-induced aggravation, epigastric pain, which had a delayed peak, was the most intense symptom and they had a lower prevalence of gastric hypersensitivity ( 27.5% vs 7.7%). Conclusion: Meal ingestion aggravates FD symptoms in the vast majority of patients, with symptom-specific time-courses. Postprandial fullness is the most severe symptom in patients reporting aggravation by a meal, while it is pain in those not reporting meal-related symptoms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据