4.0 Article

Detection of His-tagged Long-R3-IGF-I in a black market product

期刊

GROWTH HORMONE & IGF RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 5, 页码 386-390

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ghir.2010.07.001

关键词

Histidine-tag; Orbitrap mass spectrometry; Recombinant protein; Doping; Sport

资金

  1. Federal Ministry of the Interior of the Federal Republic of Germany, Antidoping Switzerland (Berne, Switzerland)
  2. Anti-Doping Authority, The Netherlands (Capelle aan den Ijssel, the Netherlands)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Performance-enhancing substances are illicitly used in elite or amateur sports and may be obtained from the black market due to a cheaper and easier availability. Although various studies have shown that black market products frequently do not contain the declared substances, enormous amounts of illegally produced and/or imported drugs are confiscated from athletes or at customs with alarming results concerning the outcome of the analyses of the ingredients. This case report describes the identification of His-tagged Long-R-3-IGF-I, which is usually produced for biochemical studies, in an injection vial. Design: The ingredients were isolated by immunoaffinity purification and identified by nano-UPLC, high-resolution/high accuracy mass spectrometry of the intact and trypsinated substance and by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: (Tandem) mass spectra characterized the protein as Long-R-3-IGF-I with a His(6)-tag attached to the C-terminus by the linker amino acids Leu-Glu. Conclusion: His-tags are commonly added to proteins during synthesis to allow a convenient and complete purification of the final product and His-tags are subsequently removed by specific enzymes when being attached to the N-terminus. The effects of His-tagged Long-R-3-IGF-I in humans have not been elucidated or described and the product may rather be a by-product from biochemical studies than synthesized for injection purposes. (C) 2010 Growth Hormone Research Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据