4.7 Article

Biomarkers of rapid chronic kidney disease progression in type 2 diabetes

期刊

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
卷 88, 期 4, 页码 888-896

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2015.199

关键词

chronic kidney disease; diabetes; epidemiology; statistics

资金

  1. Innovative Medicine Initiative [IMI/115006]
  2. Chief Scientists Office Scotland
  3. Diabetes UK [06/0003341] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0508-10274, NF-SI-0513-10012] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we evaluated the performance of a large set of serum biomarkers for the prediction of rapid progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with type 2 diabetes. We used a case-control design nested within a prospective cohort of patients with baseline eGFR 30-60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). Within a 3.5-year period of Go-DARTS study patients, 154 had over a 40% eGFR decline and 153 controls maintained over 95% of baseline eGFR. A total of 207 serum biomarkers were measured and logistic regression was used with forward selection to choose a subset that were maximized on top of clinical variables including age, gender, hemoglobin A1c, eGFR, and albuminuria. Nested cross-validation determined the best number of biomarkers to retain and evaluate for predictive performance. Ultimately, 30 biomarkers showed significant associations with rapid progression and adjusted for clinical characteristics. A panel of 14 biomarkers increased the area under the ROC curve from 0.706 (clinical data alone) to 0.868. Biomarkers selected included fibroblast growth factor-21, the symmetric to asymmetric dimethylarginine ratio, beta 2-microglobulin, C16-acylcarnitine, and kidney injury molecule-1. Use of more extensive clinical data including prebaseline eGFR slope improved prediction but to a lesser extent than biomarkers (area under the ROC curve of 0.793). Thus we identified several novel associations of biomarkers with CKD progression and the utility of a small panel of biomarkers to improve prediction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据