4.8 Article

A strategy for the simultaneous catalytic conversion of hemicellulose and cellulose from lignocellulosic biomass to liquid transportation fuels

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 653-661

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3gc41511b

关键词

-

资金

  1. DOE Great Lakes Bioenergy Research Center (DOE BER Office of Science) [DE-FC02-07ER64494]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  3. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012R1A6A3A03038323]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012R1A6A3A03038323] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We develop and evaluate an integrated catalytic conversion strategy, which utilizes both the hemicellulose and cellulose fractions of lignocellulosic biomass to produce liquid hydrocarbon fuels (butene oligomers). In this strategy, the cellulose and hemicellulose fractions are simultaneously converted to levulinic acid (LA), using LA-derived gamma-valerolactone (GVL) as a solvent. The LA is then converted to GVL, which is subsequently converted to butene, and then to butene oligomers. To generate the integrated strategy, we develop separation subsystems to achieve experimentally optimized feed concentrations for the catalytic conversion steps. Importantly, to minimize the utility requirements of the overall process, we perform heat integration, which allows us to satisfy all heating requirements from combustion of biomass residues, which are also used to produce steam for electricity generation. In addition, we develop an alternative design in which there is no electricity generation, study alternative feedstocks, and perform sensitivity analyses. Our technoeconomic analysis shows that the integrated strategy using hybrid poplar feedstock leads to a minimum selling price of $4.01 per gallon of gasoline equivalent for butene oligomers if biomass residues are sold as low quality fuel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据