4.8 Article

Electrocarboxylation of acetophenone in ionic liquids: the influence of proton availability on product distribution

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 16, 期 4, 页码 2242-2251

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3gc42404a

关键词

-

资金

  1. CSIRO Office of the Chief Executive
  2. Australian Research Council
  3. Monash University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electroreduction of acetophenone has been investigated in two dry ionic liquids (1-butyl-2,3-dimethyl-imidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([BMMIM][BF4]; [H2O] = 9.2 mM) and 1-butyl-1-methylpyrrolidiniumbis-(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide ([BMPyrd][TFSI]; [H2O] = 1.0 mM)) under both N-2 and CO2 atmospheres using transient cyclic voltammetry, near steady-state voltammetry, the bulk electrolysis technique and numerical simulations. The proton availability in both solvents is low. In these dry ionic liquids under a N-2 atmosphere, the sole reduction product detected is a dimer. The rate constants for dimer formation determined by comparison of experiment and simulation are 5.0 x 10(4) M-1 s(-1) and 4.0 x 10(3) M-1 s(-1), in [BMMIM][BF4] and [BMPyrd][TFSI], respectively. In dry [BMMIM][BF4] under a CO2 atmosphere, the products of the electroreduction of acetophenone are mixtures of 2-hydroxy-2-phenylpropionic acid, 1-phenylethanol and dimers. By contrast, the major reduction product in dry [BMPyrd][TFSI] is 2-hydroxy-2-phenylpropionic acid, suggesting that this ionic liquid is a suitable medium for electrocarboxylation. In water saturated [BMPyrd][TFSI] ([H2O] = 0.63 M), dimers are the major products under both N-2 and CO2 atmospheres. The dimerization rate constant determined for this reaction under a N-2 atmosphere was 1.0 x 10(7) M-1 s(-1); more than three orders of magnitude higher than that found in dry [BMPyrd][TFSI]. Presumably strong interactions between the acetophenone radical anions and water through an extensive hydrogen bonding network lead to a larger degree of charge delocalization and thus favour dimer formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据