4.8 Review

Ruthenium-catalyzed redox isomerization/transfer hydrogenation in organic and aqueous media: A one-pot tandem process for the reduction of allylic alcohols

期刊

GREEN CHEMISTRY
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 1992-2000

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b916117a

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia (MEC) of Spain [CTQ2006-08485/BQU]
  2. Consolider Ingenio 2010 [CSD2007-00006]
  3. Gobierno del Principado de Asturias [IB08-036]
  4. European Social Fund
  5. Ramon y Cajal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hexamethylbenzene-ruthenium(II) dimer [{RuCl(mu-Cl)(eta(6)-C6Me6)}(2)] 1 and the mononuclear bis(allyl)-ruthenium(IV) complex [RuCl2(eta(3):eta(2):eta(3)-C12H18)](2), associated with base and a hydrogen donor, were found to be active catalysts for the selective reduction of the C=C bond of allylic alcohols both in organic and aqueous media. The process, which proceeds in a one-pot manner, involves a sequence of two independent reactions: (i) the initial redox-isomerization of the allylic alcohol, and (ii) subsequent transfer hydrogenation of the resulting carbonyl compound. The highly efficient transformation reported herein represents, not only an illustrative example of auto-tandem catalysis, but also an appealing alternative to the classical transition-metal catalyzed C=C hydrogenations of allylic alcohols. The process has been successfully applied to aromatic as well as aliphatic substrates affording the corresponding saturated alcohols in 45-100% yields after 1.5-24 h. The best performances were reached using (i) 1-5 mol% of 1 or 2, 2-10 mol% of Cs2CO3, and propan-2-ol or (ii) 1-5 mol% of 1 or 2, 10-15 equivalents of NaO2CH, and water. The catalytic efficiency is strongly related to the structure of the allylic alcohol employed. Thus, in propan-2-ol, the reaction rate essentially depends on the steric requirement around the C=C bond, therefore decreasing with the increasing number of substituents. On other hand, in water the transformation is favoured for primary allylic alcohols vs. secondary ones.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据