4.3 Review

Potential of legume-based grassland-livestock systems in Europe: a review

期刊

GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE
卷 69, 期 2, 页码 206-228

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gfs.12124

关键词

yield; symbiotic N-2 fixation; forage quality; animal performance; greenhouse gas emission; nitrate leaching; animal health; climate change; energy; plant secondary metabolites; management; bloat; helminths; tannins

类别

资金

  1. European Community [FP7-266018, FP7-244983, PITN-GA-2011-289377, FP7-245216]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

European grassland-based livestock production systems face the challenge of producing more meat and milk to meet increasing world demands and to achieve this using fewer resources. Legumes offer great potential for achieving these objectives. They have numerous features that can act together at different stages in the soil-plant-animal-atmosphere system, and these are most effective in mixed swards with a legume proportion of 30-50%. The resulting benefits include reduced dependence on fossil energy and industrial N-fertilizer, lower quantities of harmful emissions to the environment (greenhouse gases and nitrate), lower production costs, higher productivity and increased protein self-sufficiency. Some legume species offer opportunities for improving animal health with less medication, due to the presence of bioactive secondary metabolites. In addition, legumes may offer an adaptation option to rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations and climate change. Legumes generate these benefits at the level of the managed land-area unit and also at the level of the final product unit. However, legumes suffer from some limitations, and suggestions are made for future research to exploit more fully the opportunities that legumes can offer. In conclusion, the development of legume-based grassland-livestock systems undoubtedly constitutes one of the pillars for more sustainable and competitive ruminant production systems, and it can be expected that forage legumes will become more important in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据