4.3 Article

Association of HLA and cytokine gene polymorphisms with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

期刊

KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
卷 31, 期 12, 页码 613-620

出版社

ELSEVIER TAIWAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2015.10.007

关键词

Cytokine; Gene polymorphism; Human leukocyte antigen; Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

资金

  1. Wuxi Administration of Science and Technology [CES00908]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a rare, progressive, and lethal interstitial lung disease with unknown etiology. Divergent observations have suggested that genetic factors contribute to IPF susceptibility. This study investigated the relationship between human leukocyte antigen (HLA), cytokine gene polymorphisms, and IPF in a Chinese Han population. The gene polymorphisms of HLA-A, -B, -DRB1, tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-alpha (-308 A/G)], transforming growth factor beta [TGF-beta 1 (+869 T/C)], interleukin 10 [IL-10 (-592 C/A, -819 T/C, and -1082 G/A)], and interferon gamma [IFN-gamma (+874 T/A)] were detected in 102 individuals with IPF and 266 unrelated normal controls using PCR with sequence-specific primers and a high-resolution melt (HRM) approach. The data showed that there was no difference in HLA allele frequencies between the IPF and control groups. However, the data showed the frequency of HLA-A*02-DRB1*04 haplotype in the IPF group was significantly higher than that in the control group [odds ratio (OR) = 4.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.82 -12.08, p < 0.001]. In addition, no differences in the allele and genotype distributions of the cytokines were found between the IPF and control groups (p > 0.01). Our findings suggest that there is an association between specific HLA haplotype and IPF genetic susceptibility and that the genetic variability of some cytokines may not be involved in the pathogenesis of IPF. Copyright (C) 2015, Kaohsiung Medical University. Published by Elsevier Taiwan LLC. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据