4.5 Article

GPS snow sensing: results from the EarthScope Plate Boundary Observatory

期刊

GPS SOLUTIONS
卷 17, 期 1, 页码 41-52

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10291-012-0259-7

关键词

GPS; Reflections; Multipath; Snow

资金

  1. NSF [EAR 0948957, AGS 0935725]
  2. CU interdisciplinary seed grant
  3. Capes/Fulbright
  4. NASA Earth System Science Research Fellowship
  5. National Science Foundation [EAR-0350028, EAR-0732947]
  6. Directorate For Geosciences
  7. Division Of Earth Sciences [1144221, 0948957] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  8. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences
  9. Directorate For Geosciences [0935725] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate measurements of snowpack are needed both by scientists to model climate and by water supply managers to predict/mitigate drought and flood conditions. Existing in situ snow sensors/networks lack the necessary spatial and temporal sensitivity. Satellite measurements currently assess snow cover rather than snow depth. Existing GPS networks are a potential source of new snow data for climate scientists and water managers which complements existing snow sensors. Geodetic-quality GPS networks often provide signal-to-noise ratio data that are sensitive to snow depth at scales of 1,000 m(2), a much larger area than for other in situ sensors. However, snow depth can only be estimated at GPS sites when the modulation frequency of multipath signals can be resolved. We use data from the EarthScope Plate Boundary Observatory to examine the potential for snow sensing in GPS networks. Examples are shown for successful and unsuccessful snow retrieval sites. In particular, GPS sites in forested regions typically cannot be used for snow sensing. Multiple-year time series of snow depth are estimated from GPS sites in the Rocky Mountains. Peak snow depths ranged from 0.4 to 1.2 m. Comparisons with independent sensors show strong correlations between the GPS snow depth estimates and the timing of snowstorms in the region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据