4.5 Article

Methodology for comparing two carrier phase tracking techniques

期刊

GPS SOLUTIONS
卷 16, 期 2, 页码 197-207

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10291-011-0222-z

关键词

Phase lock loop; Kalman filter tracking; L1 signal; L5 signal

资金

  1. General Motors of Canada
  2. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Alberta Advanced Education and Technology
  4. Western Economic Diversification Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The carrier phase tracking loop is the primary focus of the current work. In particular, two carrier phase tracking techniques are compared, the standard phase tracking loop, i.e., the phase lock loop (PLL), and the extended Kalman filter (EKF) tracking loop. In order to compare these two different techniques and taking into consideration the different models adopted in each, it is important to bring them to one common ground. In order to accomplish this, the equivalent PLL for a given EKF has to be determined in terms of steady-state response to both thermal noise and signal dynamics. A novel method for experimentally calculating the equivalent bandwidth of the EKF is presented and used to evaluate the performance of the equivalent PLL. Results are shown for both the L1 and L5 signals. Even though the two loops are designed to track equivalent dynamics and to have equivalent carrier phase standard deviations, the EKF outperforms the equivalent PLL in terms of both the transient response and sensitivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据