4.7 Article

Recurrent high grade metamorphism recording a 300 Ma long Proterozoic crustal evolution in the western part of the East European Craton

期刊

GONDWANA RESEARCH
卷 25, 期 2, 页码 649-667

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2013.04.011

关键词

East European Craton; P-T-t paths; Granulites; SIMS and EPMA dating

资金

  1. Lithuanian Science Council [MIP-034/2011]
  2. SYNTHESYS project [SE-TAF-1535]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Palaeoproterozoic lower crust, forming several belts and domains, is a major component of the crystalline basement within the large region to the southeast of the Baltic Sea in Belarus, Lithuania and Poland. Four stages of high grade metamorphism have been determined in the Western Lithuanian Granulite domain (WLG) and Belarus-Podlasie Granulite belt (BPG), the western East European Craton (EEC). We have carried out P-T studies, secondary ion mass-spectrometry (SIMS) zircon- and electron probe (EPMA) - monazite dating of peak metamorphism. The first stage occurred at 1.81-1.79 Ga under 800-900 C and 8-10 kbar and was related to both accretionary and postcollisional tectonics in the South Baltic region, whereas the stages at 1.73-1.68 Ga (700-800 degrees C, 6-7 kbar), 1.62-1.58 Ga (700 degrees C, 4-5 kbar), and 1.52-1.50 Ga (900 degrees C, c. 10 kbar) can be attributed to extensional intracratonic regimes. The 1.81-1.79 Ga stage was connected both to the major Sarmatia-Fennoscandia collision and the eastward accretion, which led to the formation of Baltica (East-European Craton) during the assembly of the Columbia (Nuna) supercontinent. The later high grade events associated with intracratonic extensions and magmatism may be distal manifestations of accretionary processes along the long-lived common Laurentia-Baltica margin. The 1.52-1.50 Ga metamorphism was associated with extensive anorthosite-mangerite-charnockite-granite magmatism in already consolidated crust. (C) 2013 International Association for Gondwana Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据