4.7 Article

Granitic magmatism, basement ages, and provenance indicators in the Malay Peninsula: Insights from detrital zircon U-Pb and Hf-isotope data

期刊

GONDWANA RESEARCH
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 1024-1037

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2010.10.010

关键词

Sundaland; Malay Peninsula; Basement; Detrital zircon; U-Pb ages; Hf-isotope dating

资金

  1. ARC LIEF
  2. DEST Systematic Infrastructure Grants, industry partners
  3. Macquarie University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Malay Peninsula lies on two continental blocks, Sibumasu and East Malaya, which are intruded by granitoids in two provinces: the Main Range and Eastern. Previous models propose that Permian-Triassic granitoids are subduction-related and syn-to post-collisional. We present 752 U-Pb analyses that were carried out on zircons from river sands in the Malay Peninsula; of these, 243 grains were selected for Hf-isotope analyses. Our data suggest a more complex Sibumasu-East Malaya collision history. (176)Hf/(177)Hfi ratios reveal that Permian-Triassic zircons were sourced from three magmatic suites: (a) Permian crustally-derived granitoids, (b) Early-Middle Triassic granitoids with mixed mantle-crust sources, and (c) Late Triassic crustally-derived granitoids. This suggests three Permian-Triassic episodes of magmatism in the Malay Peninsula, two of which occurred in the Eastern Province. Although the exact timing of the Sibumasu-East Malaya collision remains unresolved, current data suggest that it occurred before the Late Triassic, probably in Late Permian-Early Triassic. Our data also indicate that Sibumasu and East Malaya basements are chronologically heterogeneous, but predominantly of Proterozoic age. Some basement may be Neoarchaean but there is no evidence for basement older than 2.8 Ga. Finally, we show that Hf-isotope signatures of Triassic zircons can be used as provenance indicators. (C) 2010 International Association for Gondwana Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据