4.4 Article

In vivo manipulation of heparan sulfate structure and its effect on Drosophila development

期刊

GLYCOBIOLOGY
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 607-618

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwq202

关键词

Decapentaplegic; Drosophila; heparan sulfate proteoglycan; heparan sulfate-modifying enzyme; Wingless

资金

  1. National Institute of Health [R01 HD042769]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan [21770154]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21770154, 22570149] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) participate in a wide range of biological processes through interactions with a number of ligand proteins. The nature of these interactions largely depends on the heparan sulfate (HS) moiety of HSPGs, which undergoes a series of modifications by various HS-modifying enzymes (HSMEs). Although the effects of alterations in a single HSME on physiological processes have started to be studied, it remains elusive how a combination of these molecules control the structure and function of HS. Here we systematically manipulated the HS structures and analyzed their effect on morphogenesis and signaling, using the genetically tractable model organism, Drosophila. We generated transgenic fly strains overexpressing HSMEs alone or in combination. Unsaturated disaccharide analyses of HS showed that expression of various HSMEs generates distinct HS structures, and the enzymatic activities of HSMEs are influenced by coexpression of other HSMEs. Furthermore, these transgenic HSME animals showed a different extent of lethality, and a subset of HSMEs caused specific morphological defects due to defective activities of Wnt and bone morphogenetic protein signaling. There is no obvious relationship between HS unsaturated disaccharide composition and developmental defects in HSME animals, suggesting that other structural factors, such as domain organization or sulfation sequence, might regulate the function of HS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据