4.7 Article

Who remembers a hot summer or a cold winter? The asymmetric effect of beliefs about global warming on perceptions of local climate conditions in the US

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.014

关键词

Climate change; Global warming; Risk perception; Experience; Motivated reasoning; Spatial analysis; Survey research

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1102785]
  2. Association of American Geographers
  3. Surdna Foundation
  4. 11th Hour Project
  5. Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment
  6. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  7. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [1102785] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explores the phenomenon of local climate perception and the extent to which public perceptions match climate conditions as recorded in instrumental climate data. We further examine whether perceptions of changes in local climates are influenced by prior beliefs about global warming, through the process of motivated reasoning. Using national survey data collected in the United States in 2011, we find that subjective experiences of seasonal average temperature and precipitation during the previous winter and summer were related to recorded conditions during each season. Beliefs about global warming also had significant effects on subjective experiences with above-normal temperatures, particularly among those who believed that global warming is not happening. When asked about the summer of 2010, those who believed that global warming is not happening were significantly less likely to report that they had experienced a warmer-than-normal summer, even when controlling for demographics and local climate conditions. These results suggest that the subjective experience of local climate change is dependent not only on external climate conditions, but also on individual beliefs, with perceptions apparently biased by prior beliefs about global warming. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据