4.7 Article

Spatial variation of crop yield response to climate change in East Africa

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.005

关键词

Maize; Phaseolus bean; East Africa; Production; Impact assessment; Targeting; Development

资金

  1. US National Science Foundation (NSF) [0119821, 0308420]
  2. Michigan State University Foundation
  3. Division Of Behavioral and Cognitive Sci
  4. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie [0308420] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering
  6. Office Of The Director [0119821] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is general consensus that the impacts of climate change on agriculture will add significantly to the development challenges of ensuring food security and reducing poverty, particularly in Africa. While these changes will influence agriculture at a broad scale, regional or country-level assessments can miss critical detail. We use high-resolution methods to generate characteristic daily weather data for a combination of different future emission scenarios and climate models to drive detailed simulation models of the maize and bean crops. For the East African region, there is considerable spatial and temporal variation in this crop response. We evaluate the response of maize and beans to a changing climate, as a prelude to detailed targeting of options that can help smallholder households adapt. The results argue strongly against the idea of large, spatially contiguous development domains for identifying and implementing adaptation options, particularly in regions with large variations in topography and current average temperatures. Rather, they underline the importance of localised, community-based efforts to increase local adaptive capacity, take advantage of changes that may lead to increased crop and livestock productivity where this is possible, and to buffer the situations where increased stresses are likely. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据