4.7 Article

Biotic interactions in species distribution modelling: 10 questions to guide interpretation and avoid false conclusions

期刊

GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
卷 27, 期 9, 页码 1004-1016

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/geb.12759

关键词

biotic interactions; communities; co-occurrence; environment; residual structure; species distribution models

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [DO786/10-1, SH 924/1-1, DE 2754/1-1]
  2. Marie Sklodowska-Curie action [700796, 707491]
  3. Danish Carlsbergfondet [CF14-0148]
  4. Ministerium fur Wissenschaft, Weiterbildung und Kultur Rheinland-Pfalz
  5. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [707491, 700796] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim Recent studies increasingly use statistical methods to infer biotic interactions from co-occurrence information at a large spatial scale. However, disentangling biotic interactions from other factors that can affect co-occurrence patterns at the macroscale is a major challenge. ApproachFindingsWe present a set of questions that analysts and reviewers should ask to avoid erroneously attributing species association patterns to biotic interactions. Our questions relate to the appropriateness of data and models, the causality behind a correlative signal, and the problems associated with static data from dynamic systems. We summarize caveats reported by macroecological studies of biotic interactions and examine whether conclusions on the presence of biotic interactions are supported by the modelling approaches used. Irrespective of the method used, studies that set out to test for biotic interactions find statistical associations in species' co-occurrences. Yet, when compared with our list of questions, few purported interpretations of such associations as biotic interactions hold up to scrutiny. This does not dismiss the presence or importance of biotic interactions, but it highlights the risk of too lenient interpretation of the data. Combining model results with information from experiments and functional traits that are relevant for the biotic interaction of interest might strengthen conclusions. Main conclusionsMoving from species- to community-level models, including biotic interactions among species, is of great importance for process-based understanding and forecasting ecological responses. We hope that our questions will help to improve these models and facilitate the interpretation of their results. In essence, we conclude that ecologists have to recognize that a species association pattern in joint species distribution models will be driven not only by real biotic interactions, but also by shared habitat preferences, common migration history, phylogenetic history and shared response to missing environmental drivers, which specifically need to be discussed and, if possible, integrated into models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据