4.7 Article

Phylogenetic patterns of climatic, habitat and trophic niches in a European avian assemblage

期刊

GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND BIOGEOGRAPHY
卷 23, 期 4, 页码 414-424

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/geb.12127

关键词

niche conservatism; Europe; comparative method; Brownian motion; macroecological sampling; phylogenetic signal; Birds; ecological diversification; disparity through time

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Community [281422]
  2. French ANR [ANR-09-PEXT-011]
  3. EU [ENVCT-2009-226544]
  4. Swiss National Fund [31003A_122433, CRSII3_125240]
  5. Fundacion Ramon Areces
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_122433, CRSII3_125240] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim The origins of ecological diversity in continental species assemblages have long intrigued biogeographers. We apply phylogenetic comparative analyses to disentangle the evolutionary patterns of ecological niches in an assemblage of European birds. We compare phylogenetic patterns in trophic, habitat and climatic niche components. Location Europe. Methods From polygon range maps and handbook data we inferred the realized climatic, habitat and trophic niches of 405 species of breeding birds in Europe. We fitted Pagel's lambda and kappa statistics, and conducted analyses of disparity through time to compare temporal patterns of ecological diversification on all niche axes together. All observed patterns were compared with expectations based on neutral (Brownian) models of niche divergence. Results In this assemblage, patterns of phylogenetic signal (lambda) suggest that related species resemble each other less in regard to their climatic and habitat niches than they do in their trophic niche. Kappa estimates show that ecological divergence does not gradually increase with divergence time, and that this punctualism is stronger in climatic niches than in habitat and trophic niches. Observed niche disparity markedly exceeds levels expected from a Brownian model of ecological diversification, thus providing no evidence for past phylogenetic niche conservatism in these multivariate niches. Levels of multivariate disparity are greatest for the climatic niche, followed by disparity of the habitat and the trophic niches. Main conclusions Phylogenetic patterns in the three niche components differ within this avian assemblage. Variation in evolutionary rates (degree of gradualism, constancy through the tree) and/or non-random macroecological sampling probably lead here to differences in the phylogenetic structure of niche components. Testing hypotheses on the origin of these patterns requires more complete phylogenetic trees of the birds, and extended ecological data on different niche components for all bird species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据