4.8 Article

Vegetation controls on northern high latitude snow-albedo feedback: observations and CMIP5 model simulations

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 594-606

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12391

关键词

albedo; arctic; boreal forest; climate feedback; CMIP5; global change; vegetation cover

资金

  1. NASA [NNX08AG13G]
  2. NOAA Global Carbon Cycle Grant [NA080AR4310526]
  3. Colgate University Research Council
  4. NASA [101262, NNX08AG13G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [1048890] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Div Atmospheric & Geospace Sciences [1048890] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The snow-masking effect of vegetation exerts strong control on albedo in northern high latitude ecosystems. Large-scale changes in the distribution and stature of vegetation in this region will thus have important feedbacks to climate. The snow-albedo feedback is controlled largely by the contrast between snow-covered and snow-free albedo (), which influences predictions of future warming in coupled climate models, despite being poorly constrained at seasonal and century time scales. Here, we compare satellite observations and coupled climate model representations of albedo and tree cover for the boreal and Arctic region. Our analyses reveal consistent declines in albedo with increasing tree cover, occurring south of latitudinal tree line, that are poorly represented in coupled climate models. Observed relationships between albedo and tree cover differ substantially between snow-covered and snow-free periods, and among plant functional type. Tree cover in models varies widely but surprisingly does not correlate well with model albedo. Furthermore, our results demonstrate a relationship between tree cover and snow-albedo feedback that may be used to accurately constrain high latitude albedo feedbacks in coupled climate models under current and future vegetation distributions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据