4.7 Article

Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Related to Disability Among Older Adults

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glv167

关键词

IGF-1; Disability; Long-term care; Frailty

资金

  1. Health and Labor Sciences Research Grants (Comprehensive Research on Aging and Health)
  2. National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology [22-16]
  3. [26560296]
  4. [23300205]
  5. [259435]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Disability is a crucial health problem in aging. Identifying a biological contributory factor would be useful. Serum insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) plays an important role in the endocrine system and is associated with frailty. However, there is no consensus about the relationship between IGF-1 and disability. This study aimed to examine whether IGF-1 related to incident disability among older adults. The study included 4,133 older adults (mean age, 71.8 +/- 5.4 years) who were participants in the Obu Study of Health Promotion for the Elderly cohort study. We collected information on demographic variables, measured gait speed, Mini Mental State Examination score, and serum IGF-1 at baseline. During follow-up, incident disability was monitored by Long-Term Care Insurance certification. Disability was observed in 212 participants during a mean follow-up duration period of 29.2 months. A log rank test indicated that lower levels of serum IGF-1 were related to incident disability (p = .004). A Cox hazard regression showed a lower quartile in IGF-1 related to disability compared with the highest quartile (Q4), even when adjusting for covariates including gait speed and Mini Mental State Examination score (Q1: hazard ratio = 1.72, 95% confidence intervals: 1.06-2.81; Q2: hazard ratio = 1.64, 95% confidence intervals: 0.99-2.71; Q3: hazard ratio = 1.31, 95% confidence intervals: 0.76-2.25). In the analysis, stratified by sex, there was also significant relationship between IGF-1 and disability among women, but not men. Lower serum IGF-1 was independently related to disability among older adults.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据