4.8 Article

Changes in biocrust cover drive carbon cycle responses to climate change in drylands

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 12, 页码 3835-3847

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12306

关键词

bacteria; biological soil crusts; carbon cycling; climate change; drylands; fungi; lichens; soil CO2 efflux; soil net CO2 exchange

资金

  1. European Research Council under the European Community [242658]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CGL2007-63258/BOS, CGL2010-21381/BOS]
  3. Junta de Andalucia (COSTRAS project) [RNM-3614]
  4. British Ecological Society [231/1975]
  5. Spanish National Research Council (CSIC) [JAE-Pre 029]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dryland ecosystems account for ca. 27% of global soil organic carbon (C) reserves, yet it is largely unknown how climate change will impact C cycling and storage in these areas. In drylands, soil C concentrates at the surface, making it particularly sensitive to the activity of organisms inhabiting the soil uppermost levels, such as communities dominated by lichens, mosses, bacteria and fungi (biocrusts). We conducted a full factorial warming and rainfall exclusion experiment at two semiarid sites in Spain to show how an average increase of air temperature of 2-3 degrees C promoted a drastic reduction in biocrust cover (ca. 44% in 4years). Warming significantly increased soil CO2 efflux, and reduced soil net CO2 uptake, in biocrust-dominated microsites. Losses of biocrust cover with warming through time were paralleled by increases in recalcitrant C sources, such as aromatic compounds, and in the abundance of fungi relative to bacteria. The dramatic reduction in biocrust cover with warming will lessen the capacity of drylands to sequester atmospheric CO2. This decrease may act synergistically with other warming-induced effects, such as the increase in soil CO2 efflux and the changes in microbial communities to alter C cycling in drylands, and to reduce soil C stocks in the mid to long term.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据