4.8 Article

The production of phytoliths in China's grasslands: implications to the biogeochemical sequestration of atmospheric CO2

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 12, 页码 3647-3653

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12017

关键词

biogeochemical carbon sequestration; carbon sink; China; grassland; phytolith; phytolith-occluded carbon (PhytOC)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41103042]
  2. Zhejiang Province Key Science and Technology Innovation Team [2010R50030]
  3. Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Environmental Geochemistry [SKLEG9011]
  4. Opening Project of Ministry of Education Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Peking University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Among the most promising approaches of long-term atmospheric CO2 sequestration is terrestrial biogeochemical carbon sequestration. One of the most promising terrestrial biogeochemical carbon sequestration mechanisms is the occlusion of carbon within phytoliths, the silicified features that deposit within plant tissues. Using phytolith content-biogenic silica content transfer function obtained from our investigation, in combination with published silica content and above-ground net primary productivity (ANPP) data of China's grasslands, we estimated the production of phytoliths and phytolith-occluded carbon (PhytOC) in grasslands. The results show that the average above-ground phytolith production rates of China's grasslands (10.9 10(6) t yr(-1) or 1.45% of world grasslands) are much lower than those of other grasslands (e.g. North American nonwoody grasslands) mainly because of much lower ANPP. Assuming a median content of PhytOC of 1.5%, the average above-ground PhytOC production rates of China's grasslands and world grasslands are estimated to be 0.6 10(6) t CO2 yr(-1) and 41.4 10(6) t CO2 yr(-1), respectively. The management of grasslands to maximize ANPP has the potential to result in considerable quantities of phytoliths and securely bio-sequestered carbon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据