4.8 Article

Warmer climates boost cyanobacterial dominance in shallow lakes

期刊

GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 1, 页码 118-126

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02488.x

关键词

climate change; cyanobacteria; Europe; light; nutrients; phytoplankton; shade; South America; temperature; trophic state

资金

  1. European Community [ECOFRAME EVK1-CT-1999-00039]
  2. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq), Brazil [311427, 480122, 490487]
  3. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [W84-549, WB84-586]
  4. National Geographic Society [7864-5]
  5. PEDECIBA, Maestria en Ciencias Ambientales, Donacion de Aguas de la Costa S.A.
  6. Banco de Seguros del Estado, Uruguay
  7. Dutch 'Knowledge for Climate Programme'
  8. Danish Research Council for Nature and Universe
  9. EU REFRESH
  10. CRES
  11. SNI (ANII)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dominance by cyanobacteria hampers human use of lakes and reservoirs worldwide. Previous studies indicate that excessive nutrient loading and warmer conditions promote dominance by cyanobacteria, but evidence from global scale field data has so far been scarce. Our analysis, based on a study of 143 lakes along a latitudinal transect ranging from subarctic Europe to southern South America, shows that although warmer climates do not result in higher overall phytoplankton biomass, the percentage of the total phytoplankton biovolume attributable to cyanobacteria increases steeply with temperature. Our results also reveal that the percent cyanobacteria is greater in lakes with high rates of light absorption. This points to a positive feedback because restriction of light availability is often a consequence of high phytoplankton biovolume, which in turn may be driven by nutrient loading. Our results indicate a synergistic effect of nutrients and climate. The implications are that in a future warmer climate, nutrient concentrations may have to be reduced substantially from present values in many lakes if cyanobacterial dominance is to be controlled.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据