4.7 Article

The biogeochemical cycling of zinc and zinc isotopes in the North Atlantic Ocean

期刊

GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES
卷 28, 期 10, 页码 1111-1128

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2014GB004862

关键词

GEOTRACES; biogeochemical; sources; sinks; scavenging; regeneration

资金

  1. NSF [OCE-1131387]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc (Zn) is a marine micronutrient, with an overall oceanic distribution mirroring the major macronutrients, especially silicate. Seawater Zn isotope ratios (Zn-66) are a relatively new oceanographic parameter which may offer insights into the biogeochemical cycling of Zn. To date, the handful of published studies of seawater Zn-66 show the global deep ocean to be both remarkably homogeneous (approximately+0.5) and isotopically heavier than the marine sources of Zn (+0.1 to +0.3). Here we present the first high-resolution oceanic section of Zn-66, from the U.S. GEOTRACES GA03 North Atlantic Transect, from Lisbon to Woods Hole. Throughout the surface ocean, biological uptake and release of isotopically light Zn, together with scavenging of heavier Zn, leads to large variability in Zn-66. In the ocean below 1000m, Zn-66 is generally homogeneous (+0.500.14; 2SD), though deviations from +0.5 parts per thousand allow us to identify specific sources of Zn. The Mediterranean Outflow is characterized by Zn-66 of +0.1 to +0.3 parts per thousand, while margin sediments are a source of isotopically light Zn (-0.5 to -0.8 parts per thousand), which we attribute to release of nonregenerated biogenic Zn. Mid-Atlantic Ridge hydrothermal vents are also a source of light Zn (close to -0.5 parts per thousand), though Zn is not transported far from the vents. Understanding the biogeochemical cycling of Zn in the modern ocean begins to address the imbalance between the light Zn-66 signature of marine sources and the globally homogeneous deep oceans (Zn-66 of +0.5 parts per thousand) on long timescales, with overall patterns pointing to sediments as an important sink for isotopically light Zn throughout the oceans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据