4.7 Article

Winners and losers: Ecological and biogeochemical changes in a warming ocean

期刊

GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES
卷 27, 期 2, 页码 463-477

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/gbc.20042

关键词

climate change; ecology; biogeochemistry; numerical model

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science [DE-FG02-94ER61937]
  2. MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change
  3. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  4. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We employ a marine ecosystem model, with diverse and flexible phytoplankton communities, coupled to an Earth system model of intermediate complexity to explore mechanisms that will alter the biogeography and productivity of phytoplankton populations in a warming world. Simple theoretical frameworks and sensitivity experiments reveal that ecological and biogeochemical changes are driven by a balance between two impacts of a warming climate: higher metabolic rates (the direct effect), and changes in the supply of limiting nutrients and altered light environments (the indirect effect). On globally integrated productivity, the two effects compensate to a large degree. Regionally, the competition between effects is more complicated; patterns of productivity changes are different between high and low latitudes and are also regulated by how the supply of the limiting nutrient changes. These complex regional patterns are also found in the changes to broad phytoplankton functional groups. On the finer ecological scale of diversity within functional groups, we find that ranges of some phytoplankton types are reduced, while those of others (potentially minor players in the present ocean) expand. Combined change in areal extent of range and in regionally available nutrients leads to global winners and losers. The model suggests that the strongest and most robust signal of the warming ocean is likely to be the large turnover in local phytoplankton community composition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据