4.7 Article

Modeling impacts of carbon sequestration on net greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural soils in China

期刊

GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES
卷 23, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2008GB003180

关键词

-

资金

  1. Nonprofit Research Foundation for Agriculture [200803036]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soil organic carbon (SOC) contents in many farmlands have been depleted because of the long-term history of intensive cultivation in China. Chinese farmers are encouraged to adopt alternative management practices on their farms to sequester SOC. On the basis of the availability of carbon (C) resources in the rural areas in China, the most promising practices are (1) incorporating more crop residue in the soils and (2) resuming traditional manure fertilizer. By implementing the alternative practices, increase in SOC content has been observed in some fields. This paper investigates how the C sequestration strategies could affect nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) emissions from the agricultural soils in six selected sites across China. A process-based model, denitrification-decomposition or DNDC, which has been widely validated against data sets of SOC dynamics and N2O and CH4 fluxes observed in China, was adopted in the study to quantify the greenhouse gas impacts of enhanced crop residue incorporation and manure amendment under the diverse climate, soil, and crop rotation conditions across the six agroecosystems. Model results indicated that (1) when the alternative management practices were employed C sequestration rates increased, however, N2O or CH4 emissions were also increased for these practices; and (2) reducing the application rates of synthetic fertilizer in conjunction with the alternative practices could decrease N2O emissions while at the same time maintaining existing crop yields and C sequestration rates. The modeling approach could help with development of spatially differentiated best management practices at large regional scales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据