4.6 Article

Comparison of glaciological and geodetic mass balance at Urumqi Glacier No. 1, Tian Shan, Central Asia

期刊

GLOBAL AND PLANETARY CHANGE
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 14-22

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.01.001

关键词

Glaciological mass balance; Geodetic mass balance; Volume change; Uncertainty analysis; Urumqi Glacier No. 1; Tian Shan

资金

  1. Creative Research Groups of China [41121001]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41301069]
  3. SKLCS foundation [SKLCS-ZZ-2012-01-01]
  4. West Light Program for Talent Cultivation of Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2013M540779]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glaciological and geodetic measurements are two methods to determine glacier mass balances. The mass balance of Urumqi Glacier No. 1 has been measured since 1959 by the glaciological method using ablation stakes and snow pits, except during the period 1967-1979 when the observations were interrupted. Moreover, topographic surveys have been carried out at various time intervals since the beginning of the glacier observations. Therefore, glacier volume changes are calculated by comparing topographic maps of different periods during nearly 50 years. Between 1962 and 2009, Urumqi Glacier No. 1 lost an ice volume of 29.51 x 10(6) m(3), which corresponds to a cumulative ice thickness loss of 8.9 m and a mean annual loss of 02 m. The results are compared with glaciological mass balances over the same time intervals. The differences are 23%, 2.8%, 4.6%, 4.7% and 5.9% for the period 1981-1986, 1986-1994, 1994-2001, 2001-2006 and 2006-2009, respectively. For the mass balance measured with the glaciological method, the systematic errors accumulate linearly with time, whereas the errors are random for the geodetic mass balance. The geodetic balance is within the estimated error of the glaciological balance. In conclusion, the geodetic and glaciological mass balances are of high quality, and therefore, there is no need to calibrate the mass balance series of Urumqi Glacier No. 1. (c) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据