4.6 Review

How to reprogram microglia toward beneficial functions

期刊

GLIA
卷 66, 期 12, 页码 2531-2549

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/glia.23484

关键词

beneficial phenotype; metabolism; microglia; miRNA; re-program

资金

  1. ERA-NET Network European Funding for Neuroscience Research (NEURON) project MICRO-MET Merck Serono, Grant for Multiple Sclerosis Innovation (GMSI)
  2. Fondation Roger de Spoelberch
  3. Fondation Grace de Monaco
  4. Universita degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione Cariplo [2015-0910]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microglia, brain cells of nonneural origin, orchestrate the inflammatory response to diverse insults, including hypoxia/ischemia or maternal/fetal infection in the perinatal brain. Experimental studies have demonstrated the capacity of microglia to recognize pathogens or damaged cells activating a cytotoxic response that can exacerbate brain damage. However, microglia display an enormous plasticity in their responses to injury and may also promote resolution stages of inflammation and tissue regeneration. Despite the critical role of microglia in brain pathologies, the cellular mechanisms that govern the diverse phenotypes of microglia are just beginning to be defined. Here we review emerging strategies to drive microglia toward beneficial functions, selectively reporting the studies which provide insights into molecular mechanisms underlying the phenotypic switch. A variety of approaches have been proposed which rely on microglia treatment with pharmacological agents, cytokines, lipid messengers, or microRNAs, as well on nutritional approaches or therapies with immunomodulatory cells. Analysis of the molecular mechanisms relevant for microglia reprogramming toward pro-regenerative functions points to a central role of energy metabolism in shaping microglial functions. Manipulation of metabolic pathways may thus provide new therapeutic opportunities to prevent the deleterious effects of inflammatory microglia and to control excessive inflammation in brain disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据