4.6 Article

Growth and Differentiation Factor 10 (Gdf10) is Involved in Bergmann Glial Cell Development Under Shh Regulation

期刊

GLIA
卷 62, 期 10, 页码 1713-1723

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/glia.22710

关键词

Gdf10; Bmp3b; Bergmann glia; cerebellum; Nestin; Shh

资金

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad, FEDER [BFU2010-16548, BFU2011-27326]
  2. Consolider [CSD2007-00023]
  3. European commission EUCOMMTOOLS [261492]
  4. Predoctoral Program of the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas-Junta de Ampliacion de Estudios

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growth differentiation factor 10 (Gdf10), also known as Bmp3b, is a member of the transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta superfamily. Gdf10 is expressed in Bergmann glial cells, which was investigated by single-cell transcriptional profiling (Koirala and Corfas, (2010) PLoS ONE 5: e9198). Here we provide a detailed characterization of Gdf10 expression from E14, the stage at which Gdf10 is expressed for the first time in the cerebellum, until P28. We detected Gdf10 expression in both germinal zones: in the ventricular zone (VZ) of the 4th ventricle as well as in the rhombic lip (RL). The VZ has been postulated to give rise to GABAergic neurons and glial cells, whereas the RL gives rise to glutamatergic neurons. Thus, it was very surprising to discover a gene that is expressed exclusively in glial cells and is not restricted to an expression in the VZ, but is also present in the RL. At postnatal stages Gdf10 was distributed equally in Bergmann glial cells of the cerebellum. Furthermore, we found Gdf10 to be regulated by Sonic hedgehog (Shh), which is secreted by Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. In the conditional Shh mutants, glial cells showed a reduced expression of Gdf10, whereas the expression of Nestin and Vimentin was unchanged. Thus, we show for the first time, that Gdf10, expressed in Bergmann glial cells, is affected by the loss of Shh as early as E18.5, suggesting a regulation of glial development by Shh.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据