4.6 Article

Differential role of CCR2 in the dynamics of microglia and perivascular macrophages during prion disease

期刊

GLIA
卷 62, 期 7, 页码 1041-1052

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/glia.22660

关键词

neurodegeneration; ME7 model; CCR2-/-; microglial proliferation; circulating monocytes

资金

  1. European Union Seventh Framework Programme [IEF273243]
  2. Alzheimer Research UK.
  3. Medical Research Council (MRC) [MR/K022687/1]
  4. MRC [MR/K022687/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Alzheimers Research UK [ARUK-PPG2012A-4] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Medical Research Council [MR/K022687/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The expansion of the microglial population is one of the hallmarks of numerous brain disorders. The addition of circulating progenitors to the pool of brain macrophages can contribute to the progression of brain disease and needs to be precisely defined to better understand the evolution of the glial and inflammatory reactions in the brain. We have analyzed the degree of infiltration/recruitment of circulating monocytes to the microglial pool, in a prion disease model of chronic neurodegeneration. Our results indicate a minimal/absent level of CCR2-dependent recruitment of circulating monocytes, local proliferation of microglia is the main driving force maintaining the amplification of the population. A deficiency in CCR2, and thus the absence of recruitment of circulating monocytes, does not impact microglial dynamics, the inflammatory profile or the temporal behavioral course of prion disease. However, the lack of CCR2 has unexpected effects including the failure to recruit perivascular macrophages in diseased but not healthy CNS and a small reduction in microglia proliferation. These data define the composition of the CNS-resident macrophage populations in prion disease and will help to understand the dynamics of the CNS innate immune response during chronic neurodegeneration. GLIA 2014;62:1041-1052

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据