4.6 Article

Structural Remodeling of Gray Matter Astrocytes in the Neonatal Pig Brain After Hypoxia/Ischemia

期刊

GLIA
卷 58, 期 2, 页码 181-194

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/glia.20911

关键词

brain injury; Golgi staining; glia; iontophoretic cell injection; Sholl analysis

资金

  1. NHMRC
  2. APA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Astrocytes play a vital role in the brain; their structural integrity and sustained function are essential for neuronal viability, especially after injury or insult. In this study, we have examined the response of astrocytes to hypoxia/ischemia (H/I), employing multiple methods (immunohistochemistry, iontophoretic cell injection, Golgi-Kopsch staining, and D-aspartate uptake) in a neonatal pig model of H/I. We have identified morphological changes in cortical gray matter astrocytes in response to H/I. Initial astrocytic changes were evident as early as 8 h post-insult, before histological evidence for neuronal damage. By 72 h post-insult, astrocytes exhibited significantly fewer processes that were shorter, thicker, and had abnormal terminal swellings, compared with astrocytes from control brains that exhibited a complex structure with multiple fine branching processes. Quantification and image analysis of astrocytes at 72 h post-insult revealed significant decreases in the average astrocyte size, from 686 pin 2 in controls to 401 mu m(2) in H/I brains. Sholl analysis revealed a significant decrease (>60%) in the complexity of astrocyte branching between 5 and 20 1111 from the cell body. D-Aspartate uptake studies revealed that the H/I insult resulted in impaired astrocyte function, with significantly reduced clearance of the glutamate analog, D-aspartate. These results suggest that astrocytes may be involved in the pathopbysiological events of H/I brain damage at a far earlier time point than first thought. Developing therapies that prevent or reverse these astrocytic changes may potentially improve neuronal survival and thus might be a useful strategy to minimize brain damage after an H/I insult. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据