4.1 Article

Does denture-wearing status in edentulous South Korean elderly persons affect their nutritional intakes?

期刊

GERODONTOLOGY
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 169-176

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ger.12125

关键词

dentures; edentulism; nutrition

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveThe aim of this cross-sectional study was to determine whether denture-wearing status in edentulous South Korean elders affected their nutritional intakes, using the 2008-2010 data from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). BackgroundGood nutritional status is a requirement for healthy aging in the elders. Tooth loss is the key to lead to low masticatory ability and alterative food choice, which may increase the risks of systemic disease. Therefore, denture treatment is important to improve general health of edentulous persons. Materials and methodsFrom KNHANES data, 1168 edentulous older people were selected as the participants of the present study. Nutrient intake data collected via participants' 24-h dietary recalls were used to determine the ratio of nutrient intake to the Recommended Dietary Allowance for Koreans, the percentage of individuals with inadequate nutrient and the effects of denture wearing on the risk of undernourishment. ResultsThe results showed that compared to denture wearers, edentulous persons without dentures had lower intakes of potassium, niacin and vitamin C. In addition, the distribution of inadequate nutrient intake among participants without dentures was higher than among participants with dentures; the risk of undernourishment was 1.89 times that of denture wearers. [Correction made on 21 March 2014, after first online publication: [...] participants with dentures was higher than among participants without dentures was corrected to [...] participants without dentures was higher than among participants with dentures] ConclusionDenture wearing was seen to have a significant effect on the level of nutrient intake in edentulous elders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据