4.4 Article

Sex hormones and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A 9-year follow up among elderly men in Finland

期刊

GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 559-564

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ggi.12312

关键词

aged; diabetes mellitus; luteinizing hormone; sex hormone-binding globulin; testosterone; type 2

资金

  1. Finnish Heart Association
  2. Turku Health Center Research Fund
  3. Turku University Hospital Research Fund
  4. Academy of Finland
  5. Yrjo Jahnsson Foundation
  6. Paavo Nurmi Foundation
  7. Nordic Lions Club

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim: To analyze whether sex hormone levels predict the incidence of type2 diabetes among elderly Finnish men. Methods: This was a prospective population-based study, with a 9-year follow up period. The study population in the municipality of Lieto, Finland, consisted of elderly (age >= 64 years) men free of type 2 diabetes at baseline in 1998-1999 (n = 430). Body mass index and cardiovascular disease-adjusted hazard ratios and their 95% confidence intervals for type 2 diabetes predicted by testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, and testosterone/luteinizing hormone were estimated. Results: A total of 30 new cases of type 2 diabetes developed during the follow-up period. After adjustment, only higher levels of testosterone (hazard ratio for one-unit increase 0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.87-0.99, P = 0.020) and free testosterone (hazard ratio for 10-unit increase 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.91-1.00, P = 0.044) were associated with a lower risk of incident type 2 diabetes during the follow up. These associations (0.94, 95% confidence interval 0.87-1.00, P = 0.050 and 0.95, 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.00, P = 0.035, respectively) persisted even after additional adjustment of sex hormone-binding globulin. Conclusion: Higher levels of testosterone and free testosterone independently predicted a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes in the elderly men.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据