4.4 Article

Relationship between chewing ability and sarcopenia in Japanese community-dwelling older adults

期刊

GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 1007-1012

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ggi.12399

关键词

chewing ability; color-changeable gum; community; elderly; sarcopenia

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26282201] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimIt has been reported that if nutrient intake is unbalanced, muscle mass, muscle strength and physical performance declines, and therefore it is important to maintain chewing ability to keep a balanced nutrient intake. However, the relationship between chewing ability and sarcopenia has not been previously reported. Therefore, the present study investigated the relationship between chewing ability and sarcopenia in addition to known sarcopenia-related factors. MethodsWe examined 761 participants (average age 73.05.1 years), who lived in the Itabashi city of Tokyo. Our research was designed to examine the relationship between chewing ability and sarcopenia. We carried out regression analysis to analyze the relationship with sarcopenia-related factors with consideration of the age of the participants. ResultsThe 761 participants were divided into two groups in terms of the stage of sarcopenia according to whether there was a deterioration of muscle strength or physical performance. Furthermore, we carried out logistic regression analyses on the value as a dependent variable, including known sarcopenia-related factors. There were significant correlations of sarcopenia with age (odds ratio 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.52-3.70), body mass index (odds ratio 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.81) and chewing ability (odds ratio 2.18, 95% confidence interval 1.21-3.93). ConclusionsThe present study shows that chewing ability is related to sarcopenia, which is equal to the relationship with the known factor of age by odds ratio. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2015; 15: 1007-1012.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据